webinar
Oct. 27-28, 2025, Boston, MA, USA - Booth 114.
Read More

Analytical Techniques for Glycan Characterization

Characterization remains the bridge between unravelling complex glycans and transforming them into robust drug or diagnostics candidates. As there is no template to follow during glycan synthesis, their microheterogeneity can translate into functionally significant disparity (binding to target receptors, serum half-life, immunogenicity etc.). A state-of-the art campaign therefore combines orthogonal separation, ionization, and spectroscopic outputs to deconvolute monosaccharide composition, linkage identity and geometry, anomeric status, and post-glycosylational modifications such as sulfation or phosphorylation. This is not the job of a single instrument, but rather the culmination of a tiered strategy where rapid profiling technologies screen for anomalies, high-resolution methods are used for structural confirmation, and functional assays correlate chemistry to biology. The result is a dossier that can withstand the scrutiny of peer reviewers and regulators, and confirm that the glycan is produced as claimed, and behaves consistently across production batches.

Why Glycan Characterization Matters?

Far from being mere decorations, glycans represent a post-translational information layer that regulates half of the human proteome. Each glycosylation site can be occupied by a set of structurally related, but functionally diverse oligosaccharides, which ratio affects circulatory half-life, receptor binding, complement activation and immunogenicity. Therapeutic proteins for which clinical success is directly linked to effector functions (neutralization of viruses, lysis of tumors, recruitment of immune cells), are particularly sensitive to core fucosylation, galactosylation or sialylation patterns that can vary in response to upstream bioprocess parameters such as dissolved CO2, nutrient depletion or dissolved manganese. For this reason, glycan profile is now recognized as a critical quality attribute (CQA) whose drift can compromise efficacy or cause adverse reactions. Regulatory filings are expected to not only show that a consistent glycoform population is generated, but that the targeted population is mechanistically consistent with the intended mode of action. In addition to biopharmaceuticals, circulating glycoforms are starting to be used as biomarkers: On one hand early slight modifications in branched N-glycans or truncated O-glycans predominate early cancerous changes before any lesion becomes detectable through imaging methods while alterations in immunoglobulin glycosylation patterns show a relationship with increased inflammatory flare risk in autoimmune diseases. On the supply-chain side, synthetic glycans used as vaccine antigens or quantitative assay standards also need to be authenticated in order to prevent batch-to-batch epitope drift that could undermine protective immunity or invalidate diagnostic readouts.

 (A) Monomer and (B) polymer formation of BSM based on the present results (sulfated N-glycans) and previous reports (O-glycans, Cys-rich domain, Cys-knot, and S-S-bond). Fig. 1 (A) Monomer and (B) polymer formation of BSM based on the present results (sulfated N-glycans) and previous reports (O-glycans, Cys-rich domain, Cys-knot, and S-S-bond).1,5

Ensuring Structural Accuracy

Structural validation is accomplished by a series of orthogonal tests. After confirming the release completeness (digestion or chemical release with minimal peeling, desialylation or oxidation artefacts) by, e.g., buffer exchange to remove detergents, addition of scavengers and limiting pH and temperature, glycans can be analyzed in at least two orthogonal separation modes, commonly hydrophilic-interaction chromatography and porous-graphitized carbon, to reveal co-eluting isomers. The elution profile is then submitted to a series of fragmentation events (MS/MS) and the ladder of B-, Y-, C- and Z-ions expected from a given topology is compared to the experimentally obtained ions. Deviations at this step result in exoglycosidase sequencing with linkage-specific enzymes that digest one monosaccharide at a time. The identity of the monosaccharide and the anomericity are confirmed by the expected mass difference when the chain is progressively shortened. Calibration with isotopically labeled or structurally related standards is used for quantitation, while replicate analyses over several days, analysts, and instruments is used to determine precision. Fluorescence is commonly used for quantitation and MS for identity, each providing a self-validation of the other (a mismatch in the expected ratio between mass and fluorescence immediately flags incomplete derivatization or ion-suppression, for example). Finally, if available, high-field 1D- and 2D-NMR spectra of the released sample can be acquired to provide non-destructive evidence of anomericity and linkage positions. NMR data is commonly accepted by auditors as unambiguous proof of structure.

Regulatory Requirements for Biopharma

Regulatory guidances, most prominently ICH Q6B and its progeny Q5E, Q11 and Q14, have defined glycosylation as an attribute that needs to be defined at various stages of the product lifecycle, including clone selection, process development, and process validation and post-approval change control. In order to be filed, the glycan map (see above), created using validated methods, is required to be accompanied by system-suitability parameters, acceptance limits for individual glycoforms, and a rationale for the specification, supported by structure–activity relationships (SARs). Regulatory authorities expect orthogonal evidence, so a single chromatographic trace will not suffice. Sponsors present LC-MS, CE-LIF and exoglycosidase data that point to the same structural assignments. The methods used to assess glycosylation must be validated with respect to specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision and robustness in accordance with ICH Q2(R1). In particular, low-abundance species that may become prominent upon stress conditions (heat, increased shear, etc.) must have their limit-of-detection assessed. If a glycoform is linked to a critical quality attribute (e.g. afucosylated species are required for adequate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) or high-mannose species result in increased clearance from plasma), tighter specifications are set to ensure that clinical performance is not degraded during process drift. After approval, any upstream cell culture, downstream purification or formulation change that has the potential to impact glycosylation would initiate a comparability exercise of commensurate depth, with more potential risk being evaluated by side-by-side glycomic analysis, pharmacokinetic bridging studies and, in some instances, non-clinical or clinical data. Finally, chapters in pharmacopoeias related to monosaccharide composition and sialic acid content set further compendial controls, requiring each lot to meet acceptance criteria for the neutral sugar ratio and the amount of neuraminic acid.

Quality Control in Synthetic Glycans

Synthetic glycans offer a completely different QC matrix: the lack of cellular enzymes remove microheterogeneity, but potential chemical side-reactions (anomerization, protecting-group migration, incomplete deprotection) can produce isomeric impurities that can be very similar to biological artefacts. The workflow therefore logically starts from a release test: permethylation followed by MALDI-TOF screens for residual benzyl or acetyl groups that could have survived the global deprotection step. The identification of any mass matching a partially protected species prevents chromatographic discard and mandates an iterative deprotection cycle, thereby preserving the yield while ensuring homogeneity. For lot-release, a simplified HILIC-fluorescence assay is validated against a comprehensive LC-MS characterization; the fluorescence trace is expected to match the MS ion-chromatogram across all the predefined retention-time windows, guaranteeing that the quick QC method faithfully reproduces the orthogonal reference. Stability studies require additional controls: synthetic glycans stored in aqueous buffers are prone to mutarotation or sialic acid hydrolysis, so the accelerated ageing at 40 °C for six weeks is accompanied by repeated HILIC profiling to verify that no new peaks are generated. Finally, endotoxin and metal contamination, which is of no concern for research-grade material, need to be assessed when the glycan is intended for in vivo use; anion-exchange membrane adsorbers can reduce endotoxin levels to below 0.25 EU/mg, while chelating resins strip copper or zinc to sub-ppm levels, ensuring that the synthetic specimen is biologically inert until purposely conjugated to its therapeutic partner.

Fluorescent Labeling and HPLC Profiling

Fluorescent tagging followed by high-resolution liquid chromatography is now the workhorse method by which complex glycan populations are both visualized and quantified. The approach makes use of the reducing-terminal aldehyde exposed after enzymatic or chemical release: a primary amine on the dye condenses with the carbonyl to give a Schiff base that is then reduced to form a chemically stable secondary amine. The labelled glycans contain a chromophore whose molar absorptivity and quantum yield are orders of magnitude higher than any native carbohydrate. Detection limits are now driven down from the microgram towards the femtomole. The same covalent adduct provides a hydrophobic or ionizable moiety which can be exploited during separation, so resolution is improved as well as sensitivity. High-performance columns packed with sub-2 micron particles then separate the tagged species in minutes, while either fluorescence or parallel mass-spectrometric readout records a profile which encodes simultaneously identity, relative abundance and (when an internal standard is co-injected) absolute molar amount. Every stage from release process to injection can be completed in 96-well plates allowing the workflow to expand from initial cell-line screening to final lot-release testing while utilizing one analytical platform throughout discovery and QC.

Common Labeling Reagents (2-AB, 2-AA, DMB)

The most common derivatization tag is 2-aminobenzamide, which is also the first one developed. The neutral aromatic amide is derivatized under mildly acidic conditions using a cyanoborohydride reductant. Its modest hydrophobicity results in predictable retention on both RP and HILIC media and the absence of an intrinsic charge means that electrostatic interaction with either the column or the analyte is minimal, which results in symmetrical peaks even for extremely acidic glycans. 2-aminobenzoic acid employs the same reaction manifold, but the presence of a carboxyl substituent on the aromatic ring confers a negative charge on the adduct, which can be desirable either for separations at high pH or for analysis with negative-ion MS. 1,2-diamino-4,5-methylenedioxybenzene (DMB) acts on a completely different principle: its ortho-diamine group condenses with the open-chain form of sialic acids to form a fluorescent heterocycle, and thus it is used only for the selective detection of Neu5Ac and Neu5Gc, not the entire glycome. Each dye has a unique excitation/emission spectrum, so it is not uncommon to run two or three methods in parallel on the same HPLC instrument, simply switching lamp filters rather than columns as needed. In each of the three chemistries, it is imperative that water be excluded from the reductive step, the reaction be run under an inert atmosphere to avoid oxidative side-reactions, and excess reagent be removed by liquid–liquid extraction or solid-phase scavenging, and to do otherwise is to see increased chemical background, fluorescence quenching, and gradual column degradation. The reason these reagents remain in wide use even though they have never been the subject of exclusive proprietary rights is that their performance characteristics are all well documented in the pharmacopoeial and peer-reviewed literature, so that sponsors can point to precedent rather than to create new validation packages.

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Techniques

Separation and detection strategies now routinely incorporate three orthogonal modes of separation, which can be coupled either in heart-cutting or full-loop modes. Hydrophilic-interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) using amide- or zwitterion-bonded silica is the workhorse for neutral and sialylated N-glycans: because the highly organic loading solvent pushes the analyte to the surface of the stationary phase, a water-rich gradient then elutes it approximately in order of increasing size and branching, so that isomeric bisecting structures are cleanly resolved from non-bisecting analogs. Reversed-phase separations using either C18 or phenyl-hexyl materials are run at elevated temperature to minimize mass-transfer resistance: under these conditions the fluorescent tag is the main determinant of retention, so that glycans differing by the presence of a single deoxyhexose can be separated without recourse to ion-pairing additives. Porous-graphitized carbon (PGC), run in both aqueous and polar-organic modes, provides unsurpassed selectivity for linkage and anomeric isomers, but its strongly adsorptive surface requires rigorous column regeneration between injections. Modern analytical devices utilize sub-two-micron fully porous or core–shell particles with back-pressures above six hundred bar to achieve theoretical plate counts that routinely exceed 100000 per metre which enables baseline separation of over two hundred individual glycans during a single analysis sequence. Post-column splitting allows parallel fluorescence and mass-spectrometric detection without loss of sensitivity: the fluorescence trace is used to provide uniform quantitation even if ionisation efficiency is not 100%, while the mass spectrometer yields exact mass and fragment ions to confirm structural assignments. When even higher throughput is required, columns of only 50 mm in length can generate reproducible profiles in under 3 minutes, making the technique amenable to automated 96-well plate loaders and allowing a single analyst to screen several hundred cell-culture harvests in a working day.

Quantification and Glycan Mapping

Quantitative glycomics is enabled by the fact that the fluorescent signal of the tag, after covalent incorporation, is a measure of molar amount, rather than mass or ionization efficiency. A calibration curve is prepared from a commercial dextran hydrolysate whose degree-of-polymerization ladder has been gravimetrically prepared; because each member of the ladder carries exactly one label, the integrated peak area can be normalized to yield a universal response factor that converts arbitrary fluorescence units into picomoles. This factor is then applied to unknown glycans under the assumption that quantum yield is insensitive to oligosaccharide structure—an assumption that holds true for most neutral and mono-sialylated species but breaks down for heavily sulphated or multiply sialylated glycans, whose correction coefficients must be determined separately. For absolute quantitation an internal standard is introduced at the moment of protein denaturation: typically a maltooligosaccharide of unusual length that does not occur in mammalian samples, or alternatively a fully 13C-labelled glycan produced in a plant expression system. Because the standard experiences every subsequent step—release, labeling, clean-up and injection—its recovery tracks that of the analyte, cancelling volumetric and chemical losses. The resulting molar table is then normalized to the total protein concentration measured by amino-acid analysis, yielding a stoichiometry of glycosylation that can be compared across batches, clones or bioreactor conditions. Mapping software aligns retention times against a curated library containing hundreds of empirically determined standards; each assigned peak is annotated with its putable structure, mass-spectral confirmation score, and relative abundance expressed as percent of the integrated glycome. Finally, the composite profile is exported in a format compatible with multivariate statistics, so subtle shifts—whether induced by metabolic feeding, glycosyltransferase knockout or upstream pH drift—can be visualized as heat maps or principal-component trajectories, guiding process engineers toward conditions that reproducibly deliver the desired glycosylation phenotype.

Mass Spectrometry for Glycan Analysis

Mass spectrometry is no longer a supporting, but rather a critical technology for glycomics, due to its ability to provide compositional, topological, and linkage-level information from sub-picomole amounts of analyte with no pre-amplification step. Standard workflows combine soft ionization with high-resolution analyzers, capable of separating isobaric glycoforms that may differ by a single Dalton, while tandem stages generate predictable fragment ladders whose spacing is diagnostic of monosaccharide sequence, branching, and anomericity. The same experiment can be run in high-throughput "discovery" mode—mapping hundreds of released glycans in minutes—or in "targeted" mode, tracking selected precursor-to-product transitions that can report on a bioprocess drift or disease signature. Critically, the ion current produced is directly proportional to the number of molecules introduced, and so once an isotopically labelled analogue is admixed to the sample, the technique becomes inherently quantitative. By combining on-line separations, spectral archiving, and automated interpretation scripts, mass spectrometry now provides a coherent narrative linking biosynthetic pathway to clinical phenotype.

Workflow for the LC-MS analysis and glycan nomenclature. Fig. 2 Workflow for the LC-MS analysis and glycan nomenclature.2,5

MALDI-TOF vs. ESI-MS Approaches

MALDI has the tendency to produce singly charged ions, whose m/z values correspond to the molecular mass of the intact glycan. This leads to a simple, easily interpretable spectrum, making this technique appealing for quick analyses of culture supernatants or sera. Ionization occurs under vacuum and, as such, any easily dissociated substituents like sialic acids or sulphate esters are partially lost and acidic glycoforms are generally underrepresented unless permethylated prior to analysis. In contrast, electrospray ionization occurs at atmospheric pressure and often results in multiply charged envelopes, which can be deconvoluted in silico to obtain an accurate mass; the droplet-based environment is more temperate and, therefore, native acidic residues are preserved. In addition, ESI is amenable to online coupling to liquid chromatography, whereas MALDI has traditionally been used in an off-line manner. MS/MS of each chromatographic peak can be conducted in order to deconvolute isomeric co-elutions and to assign linkage positions by diagnostic fragments. MALDI, on the other hand, can tolerate high salt levels and is unaffected by flow-rate effects, making it well suited for direct tissue imaging or for high-throughput laboratories with minimal sample pre-cleaning. As such, many labs will use a two-tiered approach: MALDI for an initial screen to pick up large changes followed by nano-electrospray LC–MS/MS for deeper investigation.

Structural Elucidation via Fragmentation Patterns

The intact precursor ion is thus transformed by tandem MS into a set of fragment ions whose mass differences encode the glycosidic bond cleavages, and less commonly cross-ring ruptures that reveal the linkage positions. In this nomenclature, the ions are named B- and Y-series when the rupture passes the glycosidic oxygen, or A- and X-series when it cuts through the sugar ring; so the full ladder is a topological barcode. The weaker glycosidic bonds are preferentially cleaved by low-energy collision-induced dissociation, so the terminal residues are lost first, and the non-reducing sequence can be read from the reducing end. In higher energy regimes or under ultraviolet photodissociation, cross-ring cleavages are induced whose spacing identify 1→3 versus 1→4 linkages, and discriminate between bisecting and antennal N-acetylglucosamine. Negative-ion mode is also particularly informative for acidic glycans, since the permanent negative charge localizes on the sialic acid carboxylate, so the fragmentation pathways that follow will tend to preserve fucose while discarding sulphate or phosphate, and the position of each labile substituent can be deduced from the remnants. Software-assisted annotation matches the experimental masses to a set of theoretical fragments generated in silico from a library of biosynthetically plausible structures; ambiguous assignments can be resolved by MS³ stages that isolate and re-fragment individual product ions, iterating until only one candidate topology remains. By correlating the fragment intensities with that of the precursor ion, the approach also becomes semi-quantitative, so the same spectral acquisition can furnish both structure and relative stoichiometry without the need for further derivatization.

Combining MS with LC Separation

Coupling the column to the mass spectrometer brings the resolving power of the former and the structural specificity of the latter to bear: the heady mixture of glycans is simplified to an ordered retention map, whose peaks are then methodically fragmented. Because hydrophilic-interaction columns separate principally by size and polarity, isomeric structures that differ by the position of a single fucose or in the linkage of a terminal galactose elute several seconds apart; this temporal dispersion reduces precursor-ion overlap in the mass spectrometer and therefore increases the confidence of automated fragmentation assignments. Porous-graphitized carbon, used in capillary format, provides an orthogonal selectivity that is based on planarity and hydrophobicity, so α2,3- and α2,6-sialylated LacNAc extensions with identical mass can be completely resolved. Reversed-phase chemistry, once the domain of peptide-centric work, becomes a viable option after reductive amination with a hydrophobic fluorophore: the resulting adducts partition into the stationary phase by the cumulative hydrophobicity of both dye and glycan, so subtle differences in core fucosylation result in discernible retention shifts. Splitting the column outflow diverts roughly one-tenth of the flow to the electrospray source while the remainder is sent to the fluorescence detector, resulting in perfectly co-registered chromatograms that mutually validate the quantitative accuracy. Because electrospray is well-behaved with aqueous–organic gradients at slow flow rates, no post-column make-up solvent is needed, and the entire effluent can be introduced to the source, conserving sample when material is scarce. By archiving both the retention time and the tandem mass spectrum of every detected species, the laboratory creates a multidimensional reference library that can be interrogated years later to re-examine historical data as new biological questions arise.

NMR and Other Structural Characterization Methods

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is the only tool that can visualize the anomeric configuration, linkage position and conformational ensemble of a glycan without breaking covalent bonds or using prior derivatization. The non-destructive nature of the measurement also means that the same sample can subsequently be used for bioassays, crystallization trials or in-vivo labelling studies, making NMR a strategic pivot around which multi-technique campaigns are planned. Recent improvements in cryogenic probe sensitivity, availability of isotopically labelled standards and the development of open-source spectral libraries have shifted the practical limit from high microgram to mid-nanomole range, so even minor glycoforms isolated from a bioreactor can now be interrogated in hours rather than days. When the carbohydrate is too scarce or too heterogeneous, vibrational and chiroptical spectroscopies can be used to provide complementary fingerprints that, although less information-dense, can be recorded on bench-top instruments and interpreted by machine-learning models trained on publicly deposited data. The integration of these layers – nuclear spin, bond polarity and electronic transition – creates a self-correcting evidence bundle whose collective confidence surpasses that of any single technique.

1D and 2D NMR in Glycoscience

The one-dimensional proton spectrum is congested by the narrow chemical-shift range of the ring protons, but the anomeric region is first-order diagnostic: axial H-1 resonances of α-anomers are usually downfield of their equatorial β-counterparts, while the coupling constant of about 3–4 Hz is indicative of a diequatorial relationship around the glycosidic oxygen. The carbon-13 spectrum is less sensitive, but spread over more than 90 ppm. N-acetyl, carboxyl and deoxy carbons can be directly and unambiguously counted. In homonuclear COSY and TOCSY, the scalar-connectivity maps each pyranose ring as a distinct spin system, and therefore gluco-, galacto- and manno-stereoisomers can be distinguished by the cross-peak ladder's fingerprint. Heteronuclear single-quantum coherence transfers ¹H chemical-shift resolution to the ¹³C dimension, collapses multiplets into single contours, and thus identifies hydroxymethyl, amino and uronic acid functions. Long-range HMBC correlations across the glycosidic bond are the key experiments for sequencing: a 3-bond coupling between the anomeric proton of one residue and the aglyconic carbon of the next establishes atom-to-atom connectivity, while the coupling constant is indicative of linkage geometry. Nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) further constrains the structure: through-space contacts between H-1 of a terminal fucose and H-2 of the underlying galactose, for instance, indicates a 1→2 substitution even if no scalar pathway exists. Selective 13C-labelling at C-1 of individual monosaccharides or the biosynthetic incorporation of 15N into acetamido groups, can break chemical-shift degeneracy and lead to an unambiguous assignment of crowded anomeric multiplets if spectral congestion persists. Temperature-dependent line-shape analysis can be used to interrogate conformational exchange: for example, a broadened fucose H-5 signal that becomes sharp upon cooling suggests microsecond flexibility around the α1→6 linkage, a motion that is correlated with altered lectin affinity. Taken together, these sequences create a multidimensional landscape, where chemical shift, scalar coupling, and dipolar contact are complementary and can deliver an atomic-level picture of primary sequence, secondary conformation and dynamic disorder.

Complementary Techniques (IR, UV, CD)

The complementary specificity of infrared spectroscopy also provides a fast test of functional-group identity: the anomeric C–H bend at ~840 cm−1 differentiates α- and β-configurations in samples where NMR may be limited; and sulfate esters have a characteristic split S=O stretching vibration at ~1240 cm−1, which is lost upon desulfation, enabling label-free testing of the presence or absence of these groups in ECM mimics. UV–visible absorbance is generally ignored for neutral glycans, but the attachment of a nitrophenyl aglycon or benzophenone photo-crosslinker introduces a chromophore whose λmax shifts with glycosylation; this chromophore can be used to monitor enzymatic transfer directly in microtitre plates in real-time, without requiring a fluorescent tag. Circular dichroism (CD) becomes necessary when analyzing glycopeptides: the peptide amide π→π* transition of the peptide backbone at 190–200 nm couples with the sugar ring transitions to produce exciton-split Cotton effects which report on the relative alignment of the carbohydrate with respect to the peptide helix. Temperature-dependent CD can further provide melting curves of glyco-protein complexes which are undetectable by calorimetry when the binding enthalpy is small. In combination, these optical properties provide low-resolution, high-throughput filters: any sample whose IR or CD spectrum deviates from a baseline of historical spectra is earmarked for NMR, without the loss of limited material.

Software and Databases for Spectrum Interpretation

Contemporary glyco-informatics workflows take raw free-induction decays (FIDs) or FT-IR interferograms as input and return lists of ranked structures in a matter of minutes, in effect bypassing the assignment bottleneck. Algorithmically, this takes advantage of data-mined libraries that catalog chemical shifts, coupling constants and cross-peak geometries for synthetic standards, so that an unassigned HSQC spectrum is compared to a multi-dimensional kernel density estimate that gives a probability for each topology. Machine-learning methods built from tens of thousands of fully-annotated spectra can predict 1H and 13C shifts from connection tables with errors smaller than the intrinsic line-width, which is used for forward simulation of a hypothetical structure and refinement via iterative comparison to the experimental data. For partial assignments, fragmentation-aware algorithms integrate MSn spectra with NMR constraints into a single scoring metric, so a glycan that loses a 146 Da fragment but has an N-acetyl proton at 2.0 ppm will be penalized if the candidate set has structures that are not acetylated. Cloud-based libraries also promote community curation: users can upload not only peak lists, but the underlying FIDs, allowing re-processing as new pulse sequences or referencing standards become available. The use of ontology-based metadata (biological source, linkage patterns, anomerism) also support cross-study aggregation, so a scientist working on plant pectins can quickly filter the database for homogalacturonan fragments whose 13C-6 chemical shift is beyond the expected range, flagging potential methyl-ester modifications. Interactive widgets overlay experimental and simulated traces, allowing visual confirmation of automated assignments and manual tuning of uncertain regions. Cumulatively, these cyber-infrastructure components transform previously-esoteric spectral libraries into living resources that shorten the distance from experimental raw data to biologically-meaningful glycan structures.

Integrating Synthesis and Analytical Services

The gap between synthetic chemistry and analytical testing has traditionally been a breeding ground for expensive iterations: an elegant coupling reaction deemed "finished" on a TLC screen later fails QC after trace metal contamination or anomeric impurities are revealed by orthogonal detection. We close this gap by embedding real-time analytics inside every synthetic step. Microflow NMR coils, inline UV cells, and rapid LC–MS sipper probes all feed a common dashboard where chemists and analysts have access to the exact same raw data from day one. This holistic approach turns sequential hand-offs into parallel optimization loops and shortens project calendars by eliminating the moral hazard of "synthesis first, analysis later". The sections below show how this integrated mindset can turn into hard efficiency gains for biopharma partners.

One-Stop Workflow: From Synthesis to Data

It is desirable to encode in the pipeline upstream planning in-silico retrosynthetic analysis already containing the expected purification windows and NMR spectral fingerprints: when the target structure is submitted, the suggested route's projected retention times and mass fragments are auto-populated in the scheduler for the analytical core. At the end of each glycosylation operation, a sub-sample is pipetted by an automated arm onto a micro-scaled hydrolysis plate, liberating the partial structure(s) with fluorescent or isotopic label(s) chosen for orthogonality with the upcoming LC–MS mobile phase to preclude solvent mismatch and the attendant unavoidable drop in sensitivity. While preparative HPLC fractions are harvested whose UV trace is immediately evaluated against the expected chromatogram, significant aberrations prompt an automatic re-injection under a different gradient slope instead of awaiting off-line human arbitration. The same fractions are diverted in picomole quantities to a cryogenic NMR probe to acquire a 1H–13C HSQC overnight while the major portion continues to the next synthetic cycle. All primary data—LC retention volumes, MS2 spectra, coupling constants—are hashed as a time-stamped zip file that is immutably tagged to the synthetic batch record, so that every future audit trail can "replay" the exact decision trail. By the workflow being containerized in cloud-native code, a client can reproduce the entire environment in a remote facility with a simple pull of the repository, thus extending the one-stop principle to a multi-site level without re-validation.

Reducing Turnaround Time and Costs

Integration compresses the length of the calendar: the contractual lag time of external outsourcing (purchase orders, material-transfer agreements, customs paperwork and shipping insurance) is replaced by a barcode scan that can shuttle a vial from synthesis to spectroscopy in hours rather than weeks. Parallelization speeds delivery still further: while a protected glycosyl donor is being hydrogenolyzed, the previous batch can be in quantitative NMR, bringing resource utilization closer to the theoretical ideal. Economies of scope result because the same isotopically labelled internal standard (synthesized at gram scale in one go) can be used for hundreds of client projects, spreading its cost over a broad portfolio. Solvent use can be curtailed when purification scouting is driven by real-time analytics: a failed coupling can be aborted at the gram scale, before several liters of mobile phase are wasted isolating side-products. Labor cost can be kept in check by cross-training (synthetic chemists learn to prepare NMR tubes and adjust shims, analysts run small-scale hydrogenation reactions, peak staffing requirements are flattened). Most importantly, the integrated model turns fixed overheads (idle spectrometers, under-used glove-boxes) into billable hours, reducing marginal cost per sample to a level that can compete with low-wage countries without compromising data integrity or IP security.

Custom Analytical Packages for Biopharma Clients

Drug manufacturers encounter a diverse set of challenges based on the type of molecule they are developing: A mAb will need its glycosylation sites to be verified by peptide mapping, while an mRNA product will need its synthetic lipids to be characterized. Instead of taking a one-size-fits-all approach, the one-stop-shop bundles a set of building blocks that stack the necessary unit operations (release enzyme, fluorophore derivatization, LC–MS/MS, NMR, endotoxin testing, bioburden...) to tailor the depth of the project to the maturity of the program. Exploratory programs may choose the fast-track version where high-resolution MS and one-dimensional proton NMR are enough to support a go/no-go decision; late-stage programs will get the full battery with orthogonal validated peptide mapping, sialic acid quantification and forced-degradation profiling. All analyses are performed under a quality agreement and can withstand regulatory scrutiny in the form of marketing-authorization inspections. Each bundle is accessible through a secure customer portal that shows dynamic certificates of analysis; any out-of-specification result generates a deviation report in real time that recommends both a chemical hypothesis and synthetic solution, thus relieving the sponsor from having to quickly mobilize an interdisciplinary team of experts. Licensing terms are such that the raw data generated remain the property of the sponsor while the platform can make use of the anonymized metadata to improve algorithms moving forward. This model makes method development available at low risk for future programs as well.

Partner with Our Glycan Analysis Experts

Accurate glycan characterization is critical to validating structure, purity, and biological performance. Our glycan analysis services combine state-of-the-art instrumentation, specialized expertise, and data-driven quality control to help you achieve clear, defensible results-every time.

We provide a full spectrum of glycoanalytics, including HPLC profiling, mass spectrometry (MS), and NMR spectroscopy. Each technique is carefully selected and optimized for your specific glycan type, complexity, and downstream application-ensuring structural confidence and reproducibility.

Our unique end-to-end glycan service platform bridges synthesis, purification, and analysis in a single streamlined workflow. This integrated approach minimizes turnaround time, reduces variability, and provides unified data across the entire development cycle—from design to final validation.

Every project includes comprehensive documentation and electronic data packages with chromatograms, spectra, and interpretive reports. Our scientists deliver quantitative and qualitative analysis suitable for regulatory submissions, academic publications, and biopharma R&D documentation.

Whether you're profiling glycans in antibody therapeutics, glycoconjugate vaccines, or biomarker discovery, we tailor our analytical strategy to your research goals. Our mission is to provide precision analytics that empower confident decision-making and accelerate innovation.

Work with a Dedicated Glycan Analytics Partner

Trusted by global biotech and pharmaceutical companies, our glycan characterization team delivers accuracy, consistency, and scientific insight across every project. We turn complex analytical data into actionable biological understanding.

Ready for precise glycan insights? Contact our Glycan Analysis Experts to discuss your analytical needs or request a detailed quotation.

FAQs

1. Why is glycan characterization important?

It verifies molecular identity, purity, and function—essential for drug development, vaccine design, and quality control.

2. Which analytical methods are used for glycan profiling?

Common methods include HPLC, mass spectrometry (MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.

3. What is the role of fluorescent labeling in glycan analysis?

It enhances detection sensitivity during chromatographic profiling and enables accurate quantification.

4. How is mass spectrometry used for glycan analysis?

MS determines molecular weight, linkage type, and structural composition, often coupled with LC for detailed profiling.

5. Does your company offer glycan analysis as a standalone service?

Yes. Our glycan analysis experts provide comprehensive characterization packages for both synthetic and natural glycans.

References

  1. Kim J, Lee B, Lee J, et al. N-glycan modifications with negative charge in a natural polymer mucin from bovine submaxillary glands, and their structural role[J]. Polymers, 2020, 13(1): 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13010103.
  2. Reyes C D G, Hakim M A, Atashi M, et al. LC-MS/MS isomeric profiling of N-Glycans derived from low-abundant serum glycoproteins in mild cognitive impairment patients[J]. Biomolecules, 2022, 12(11): 1657. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12111657.
  3. Chia S, Teo G, Tay S J, et al. An integrative glycomic approach for quantitative meat species profiling[J]. Foods, 2022, 11(13): 1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11131952.
  4. Castañeda-Casimiro J, Vallejo-Castillo L, S.-Peregrino E, et al. N-Glycosylation of Antibodies: Biological Effects During Infections and Therapeutic Applications[J]. Antibodies, 2025, 14(4): 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/antib14040093.
  5. Distributed under Open Access license CC BY 4.0, without modification.

* Only for research. Not suitable for any diagnostic or therapeutic use.
Send Inquiry
Verification code